<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Eitan Suez's Home: Smalltalk</title>
    <link>http://u2d.com/articles/2005/12/22/smalltalk</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Smalltalk</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What I love about smalltalk is that nothing is out of band.  The number of concepts is so brilliantly minimal.  By simply treating a block of code as an object, you can implement control structures and exception handling &lt;em&gt;in the language&lt;/em&gt;.  Code such as:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;[#(1 2 4) at: 5] ifError: [:msg :obj | nil].
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;p&gt;..is pure beauty (taken from pg 202, &lt;em&gt;Squeak, A Quick Trip to ObjectLand&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It also makes me wonder why ruby is getting so much attention when in fact the things that make ruby great are essentially borrowed smalltalk features.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:11:58 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:62ed01e0bd83fce94e546f31f09053ee</guid>
      <author>eitan</author>
      <link>http://u2d.com/articles/2005/12/22/smalltalk</link>
      <category>Programming</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
